A discussion during a Bible Study session held last year on the subject of risk-taking has been occupying my mind. It has taken me a while to pull together all the references I wanted to share - and the preparation for this entry took me right back to the economics and insurance textbooks that I studied all those years ago!
You see, each of us have a different perception of risk. We treat it differently. Some people actively seek out risk, and live life on the edge all the time. These are probably the bungee-jumpers, the potholers, cliff-divers. This could also include those who are tempted to gamble. They are known as risk preferrers. Others are less enthralled by the prospect, and are by nature much more cautious (or risk averse). Take investments; imagine a choice of two almost similar stocks, a risk averse investor would prefer the one with the lower risk.
I understand that men tend to be risk preferrers, with women tending to be risk adverse. I'm sure there are a whole host of exceptions to that rule that will come to mind, and I would agree with you, however that is the general trend.
The point was made during the Bible Study is that statisticially there are fewer men in the church than women. Is this because of the style of worship? The length of the meetings? The quality of tea or coffee we drink afterwards? If men tend to be the risk-takers of society, why don't you see them taking a risk and giving the Christian lifestyle a go for a change? It's certainly not easy at times, the challenges are high, the level of commitment needed is total. Plenty of risk here.
I've read around the topic, and one article that I read online said that men live this way, live life on the edge, so they can earn their place in society. They face financial ruin, run the risk of injury or even death to win through and gain the respect of their fellow man. Even in an office environment us fellas are told 'lunch is for wimps'! Men need to win, to be successful. Second place isn't what they're aiming for. Plan A is to succeed and win the grand prize. Winning that big contract, meeting that deadline, pulling out all the stops. How highly do us men rate our soccer stars, putting them up on a pedestal when they win through, win that trophy. How quickly are they dropped when they fail.... how easy the criticism flows when they miss the mark!
Maybe that's the key... I know many male friends who struggle because they've tried - and failed. When you're a winner, everyone wants to know you; when you're no longer winning you're yesterday's news.
But in really not an issue when you respond to Jesus' call. Society criticises, but Christ forgives. His stock in trade is 'second chances'. He offers you new life, a new purpose.
Sure it's risky - but He wants to share the adventure with you, to walk alongside you, to give you advice. To share the highs - and the lows - with you.
Why not give it a go?
You see, each of us have a different perception of risk. We treat it differently. Some people actively seek out risk, and live life on the edge all the time. These are probably the bungee-jumpers, the potholers, cliff-divers. This could also include those who are tempted to gamble. They are known as risk preferrers. Others are less enthralled by the prospect, and are by nature much more cautious (or risk averse). Take investments; imagine a choice of two almost similar stocks, a risk averse investor would prefer the one with the lower risk.
I understand that men tend to be risk preferrers, with women tending to be risk adverse. I'm sure there are a whole host of exceptions to that rule that will come to mind, and I would agree with you, however that is the general trend.
The point was made during the Bible Study is that statisticially there are fewer men in the church than women. Is this because of the style of worship? The length of the meetings? The quality of tea or coffee we drink afterwards? If men tend to be the risk-takers of society, why don't you see them taking a risk and giving the Christian lifestyle a go for a change? It's certainly not easy at times, the challenges are high, the level of commitment needed is total. Plenty of risk here.
I've read around the topic, and one article that I read online said that men live this way, live life on the edge, so they can earn their place in society. They face financial ruin, run the risk of injury or even death to win through and gain the respect of their fellow man. Even in an office environment us fellas are told 'lunch is for wimps'! Men need to win, to be successful. Second place isn't what they're aiming for. Plan A is to succeed and win the grand prize. Winning that big contract, meeting that deadline, pulling out all the stops. How highly do us men rate our soccer stars, putting them up on a pedestal when they win through, win that trophy. How quickly are they dropped when they fail.... how easy the criticism flows when they miss the mark!
Maybe that's the key... I know many male friends who struggle because they've tried - and failed. When you're a winner, everyone wants to know you; when you're no longer winning you're yesterday's news.
But in really not an issue when you respond to Jesus' call. Society criticises, but Christ forgives. His stock in trade is 'second chances'. He offers you new life, a new purpose.
Sure it's risky - but He wants to share the adventure with you, to walk alongside you, to give you advice. To share the highs - and the lows - with you.
Why not give it a go?
No comments:
Post a Comment